Scroll to the bottom of the page. Observe that the "next ›" link does not have a sort or t parameter, so clicking that link results in a page with no results.
Manually edit the URL to add the missing parameters and click the link. (There are results.)
Scroll to the bottom of the page. Observe that the "next ›" link is again missing the sort and t parameters.
Steps to reproduce:
1. Perform a search using non-default options for "sorted by:" and "links from:", bringing you to a page like https://teddit.net/r/baseball/search?q=baseball&restrict_sr=on&nsfw=on&sort=top&t=month .
2. Scroll to the bottom of the page. Observe that the "next ›" link does not have a `sort` or `t` parameter, so clicking that link results in a page with no results.
3. Manually edit the URL to add the missing parameters and click the link. (There are results.)
4. Scroll to the bottom of the page. Observe that the "next ›" link is again missing the `sort` and `t` parameters.
(Similar to [#194](https://codeberg.org/teddit/teddit/issues/194).)
Now both prev and next link include sort and t parameters. 7c7709e74f The search functionality doesn't still work perfectly, especially when prev link is used, but it's better now.
Now both prev and next link include `sort` and `t` parameters. 7c7709e74f The search functionality doesn't still work perfectly, especially when prev link is used, but it's better now.
Steps to reproduce:
sort
ort
parameter, so clicking that link results in a page with no results.sort
andt
parameters.(Similar to #194.)
Now both prev and next link include
sort
andt
parameters.7c7709e74f
The search functionality doesn't still work perfectly, especially when prev link is used, but it's better now.