Taha Ahmed
580141bd28
+ added a screenshot of example spectrum (as it looks in the app) |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| Fe2O3-thin-film-ZnO_r=0.5_3.1-3.3_0.48-0.85_1.5-1.75.csv | ||
| README.md | ||
| ZnO-QDs-MB_r=2_3.6-3.9_0.25-0.70_2.8-3.1.txt | ||
| ZnO-QDs-MB_r=2_3.75-4.00_0.20-0.75_2.75-3.15.txt | ||
| ZnO-QDs-MB_r=2_4.0-4.2_0.20-0.50_2.8-3.2.txt | ||
README.md
Example spectra
Short description of the included example spectra. If you add more spectra, please add a description below.
Fe2O3-thin-film-ZnO_r=0.5_3.1-3.3_0.48-0.85_1.5-1.75.csv
Thin film of iron oxide (most likely poorly crystallised hematite) on top of ZnO nanorods.
ZnO-QDs-MB_r=2_3.6-3.9_0.25-0.70_2.8-3.1.txt
ZnO quantum dots in aqueous suspension, in the presence of methylene blue. The band edge is distinct and not obscured in any way.
ZnO-QDs-MB_r=2_3.75-4.00_0.20-0.75_2.75-3.15.txt
ZnO quantum dots in aqueous suspension, in the presence of methylene blue. This spectrum shows a slightly elevated baseline (due to scattering in the solution) but since the band edge is mostly vertical this leads to only a very small artificial shift of the calculated optical band gap.
ZnO-QDs-MB_r=2_4.0-4.2_0.20-0.50_2.8-3.2.txt
ZnO quantum dots in aqueous suspension. This spectrum demonstrates significant baseline shift due to strong scattering in the solution (in turn due to high turbidity). This leads to a large artifical shift of the calculated band gap (this is effectively an error, caused by the poor transparency of the solution).
