Hi, this is a question, not a bug report.
I'm wondering if adding the JsLibCache extension
will make any difference when I'm already running LocalCDN?
I'm using FF by the way.
From my personal usage, it seems that JsLibCache serves first, if the resources are not cached by JsLibCache, then LocalCDN will serve. Although I am aware that the raw number of resrouces LocalCDN has is higher than JsLibCache, I'm curious if there is any advantage to have JsLibCache besides LocalCDN or if it just adds extra weight.
I don't know Firefox's internal stuff in detail, but it's possible that JsLibCache serves first because it was installed first. Anyway, theoretically JsLibCache should be able to intercept any request. Only if that is not possible because it is a font or an unsupported CDN then LocalCDN would see the request.
I've never tried this and don't see any advantage in it, but it's highly dependent on the websites you visit.
Deleting a branch is permanent. It CANNOT be undone. Continue?