Felix Lechner lechner
  • Joined on Feb 16, 2021
Loading Heatmap…

lechner pushed to typo at lechner/foot

1 week ago

lechner created pull request dnkl/foot#895

Fix typo in manual page for foot.ini(5).

1 week ago

lechner pushed to typo at lechner/foot

1 week ago

lechner created branch typo in lechner/foot

1 week ago

lechner commented on pull request dnkl/foot#408

Must have all required modifiers to un-shift a symbol

@dnkl Thanks for writing! Everything still works here with this branch.

10 months ago

lechner commented on pull request dnkl/foot#380

Rewrite of how we match key bindings

@dnkl This branch, when rebased on `master`, did everything I was looking for! I did not see any warnings whatsoever, except when I uncommented those two…

11 months ago

lechner commented on pull request dnkl/foot#380

Rewrite of how we match key bindings

@dnkl @craigbarnes Is there anything I can test—perhaps around the inverted <kbd>Shift</kbd> on the number keys or [any reassigned…

11 months ago

lechner created pull request dnkl/foot#382

Add NAME section to foot-ctlseqs.7; fixes whatis entry for manual page.

11 months ago

lechner pushed to fix-whatis at lechner/foot

  • e54abd1c33 Add NAME section to foot-ctlseqs.7; fixes whatis entry for manual page.

11 months ago

lechner created repository lechner/foot

11 months ago

lechner commented on pull request dnkl/foot#380

Rewrite of how we match key bindings

> What I'm hoping, is that both ctrl+0, and ctrl+shift+u works with **this** PR. They do. Thank you!

11 months ago

lechner commented on pull request dnkl/foot#380

Rewrite of how we match key bindings

> <kbd>Ctrl</kbd>+<kbd>Shift</kbd>+<kbd>u</kbd> should work Should work in what I currently have, i.e. only with https://codeberg.org/dnkl/foot/issues/378 applied?

11 months ago

lechner commented on pull request dnkl/foot#380

Rewrite of how we match key bindings

> this _should_ fix your issue with `Control+0`. Maybe I'm getting confused. `Control+0` works here. I believe my issue is with `Control+Shift+u` after applying…

11 months ago

lechner commented on issue dnkl/foot#376

Consumed modifiers not handled correctly

Upon reflection, I think `XKB` should return five values. For all keyboard layouts, we require: 1. the *modifiers* that helped generate the symbol; 2. the *selected symbol* with modifiers…

11 months ago

lechner commented on issue dnkl/foot#376

Consumed modifiers not handled correctly

> we really mean in this case is a qwerty layout I don't think so. Here, both state machines would serve the same custom US layout. 🙂 (Or, I could use the same machine.)

11 months ago

lechner commented on issue dnkl/foot#376

Consumed modifiers not handled correctly

> we _have_ all that information already. That totally ties into my idea! You deduce the base mapping from the key code, but XKB could do better by *also* suppling the true Latin mapping, which…

11 months ago

lechner commented on issue dnkl/foot#376

Consumed modifiers not handled correctly

> a per-binding option (`--to-code`) Among the options you presented that strikes me as the most versatile, but would it not be better to have a non-latin to latin mapping *on the symbol…

11 months ago

lechner commented on issue dnkl/foot#376

Consumed modifiers not handled correctly

What if I use [a keyboard layout](https://salsa.debian.org/lechner/rocket-layout) based on the [great Halmak design](https://github.com/MadRabbit/halmak)? (The letter <kbd>l</kbd> is located where…

11 months ago

lechner commented on issue dnkl/foot#376

Consumed modifiers not handled correctly

> whether `Control+Shift+U` should be allowed I'm so confused! Should that be `Control+Shift+u` instead (lowercase)?

11 months ago

lechner commented on issue dnkl/foot#376

Consumed modifiers not handled correctly

That seems to be [peculiar to the Russian layout](https://github.com/swaywm/sway/pull/3058#issuecomment-457808630). Should they not specify the Cyrillic key *symbol* (or temporarily switch to a…

11 months ago