keyoxide
/
keyoxide-web
14
109
Fork 22
Code Issues 48 Pull Requests Projects 2 Releases 43 Wiki Activity
Labels Milestones
New Issue

Make a tool to automate much of the proofs. #42

Open
opened 2 years ago by yisraeldov · 7 comments
yisraeldov commented 2 years ago

The adding off proffs right now is pretty tedious, and it seems like it would be a good idea to reduce the barrier of entry and have a tool (command line or gui) that would automate much of the process.

The adding off proffs right now is pretty tedious, and it seems like it would be a good idea to reduce the barrier of entry and have a tool (command line or gui) that would automate much of the process.
yarmo added the
enhancement
 label 2 years ago
yarmo commented 2 years ago
Owner

Completely agreed, we need simpler tools! I'll have some news about this front soon :)

Completely agreed, we need simpler tools! I'll have some news about this front soon :)
yisraeldov commented 2 years ago
Poster

There was one on github, I asked him to move it here.

There was one on github, I asked him to move it here.
shom commented 2 years ago

@yisraeldov

There was one on github, I asked him to move it here.

It has been moved here: https://codeberg.org/shom/keyoxidizer

@yarmo I chose an Apache v2 license for this to begin with. I read your reasoning behind AGPL for keyoxide and that makes a lot of sense. I think it might make sense to leave the driver/interface like keyoxidizer as Apache v2 so non-GPL software can use the utility to interface without concern (and it's all client-side). This is the same model that MongoDB uses where the core DB is AGPL but the drivers are Apache.

I wanted explain my rationale and wanted to check if I was missing anything.

@yisraeldov > There was one on github, I asked him to move it here. It has been moved here: https://codeberg.org/shom/keyoxidizer @yarmo I chose an Apache v2 license for this to begin with. I read your reasoning behind AGPL for keyoxide and that makes a lot of sense. I think it might make sense to leave the driver/interface like keyoxidizer as Apache v2 so non-GPL software can use the utility to interface without concern (and it's all client-side). This is the same model that MongoDB uses where the core DB is AGPL but the drivers are Apache. I wanted explain my rationale and wanted to check if I was missing anything.
yarmo commented 2 years ago
Owner

Great to see Keyoxidizer move to Codeberg \o/ with regards to license choice, sounds good to me!

Great to see Keyoxidizer move to Codeberg \o/ with regards to license choice, sounds good to me!
shom commented 2 years ago

@yarmo

Great to see Keyoxidizer move to Codeberg \o/

For full transparency, I'm pushing to both github and codeberg in the utility's spirit of making things easier for users. But codeberg will be a first class citizen (I've self-hosted gitea for a while and really like it and I'm in support of codeberg in mission and donating).

@yarmo >Great to see Keyoxidizer move to Codeberg \o/ For full transparency, I'm pushing to both github and codeberg in the utility's spirit of making things easier for users. But codeberg will be a first class citizen (I've self-hosted gitea for a while and really like it and I'm in support of codeberg in mission and donating).
yarmo commented 1 year ago
Owner

Update on this: I tried to include key management features in the https://codeberg.org/keyoxide/cli project but it turned out to be slightly too complicated for now. Keyoxidizer is still the only claim management tool for now.

I'm still looking into ways to add this to the "official" keyoxide cli but if I find the time soon, I will contribute to keyoxidizer.

Update on this: I tried to include key management features in the https://codeberg.org/keyoxide/cli project but it turned out to be slightly too complicated for now. Keyoxidizer is still the only claim management tool for now. I'm still looking into ways to add this to the "official" keyoxide cli but if I find the time soon, I will contribute to keyoxidizer.
shom commented 1 year ago

I'm still looking into ways to add this to the "official" keyoxide cli but if I find the time soon, I will contribute to keyoxidizer.

@yarmo if you'd like to and it makes sense with your vision/architecture, the keyoxide cli could call the keyoxidizer script and keyoxidizer can exit back to keyoxide cli. If you're interested in doing that and want to package keyoxidizer and make it a part of keyoxide, I would be happy to make keyoxide cli the owner. I also welcome any other ideas on collaborating!

If you do find some time to contribute to keyoxidizer, I could absolutely use some help on this issue: shom/keyoxidizer#1!

> I'm still looking into ways to add this to the "official" keyoxide cli but if I find the time soon, I will contribute to keyoxidizer. @yarmo if you'd like to and it makes sense with your vision/architecture, the keyoxide cli could call the keyoxidizer script and keyoxidizer can exit back to keyoxide cli. If you're interested in doing that and want to package keyoxidizer and make it a part of keyoxide, I would be happy to make keyoxide cli the owner. I also welcome any other ideas on collaborating! If you do find some time to contribute to keyoxidizer, I could absolutely use some help on this issue: https://codeberg.org/shom/keyoxidizer/issues/1!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
main
Labels
Apply labels
Clear labels
bug
Something is not working duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists enhancement
New feature help wanted
Need some help invalid
Something is wrong low hanging fruit
Beginner friendly issues question
More information is needed wontfix
This won't be fixed
No Label bug duplicate enhancement help wanted invalid low hanging fruit question wontfix
Milestone
Set milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Assign users
Clear assignees
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

This issue currently doesn't have any dependencies.

Write Preview
Loading…
Cancel
Save
There is no content yet.
Delete Branch '%!s(MISSING)'

Deleting a branch is permanent. It CANNOT be undone. Continue?

No
Yes