Content of the home page #15

Merged
dachary merged 2 commits from wip-homepage into main 4 months ago
Owner

See the rendering at https://forgejo.codeberg.page/@wip-homepage/


See also the Launch strategy, Positioning and Value proposition as it defines the audience, the values and put them in context with the strategy for the launch. And to the extent possible with the long term strategy.

See the rendering at https://forgejo.codeberg.page/@wip-homepage/ --- See also the [Launch strategy, Positioning and Value proposition](https://codeberg.org/codename/meta/issues/24#issuecomment-687403) as it defines the audience, the values and put them in context with the strategy for the launch. And to the extent possible with the long term strategy.
dachary requested review from fnetX 4 months ago
dachary requested review from circlebuilder 4 months ago
dachary requested review from caesar 4 months ago
dachary requested review from oliverpool 4 months ago
dachary requested review from Ryuno-Ki 4 months ago
fnetX reviewed 4 months ago
<p>
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit. Earum et veniam fugit sunt, vel enim laborum ratione
tenetur, qui veritatis cumque quaerat doloremque? Adipisci quidem sunt quia esse nam quo.
Gitea exclusively Free Software forever.
fnetX commented 4 months ago
Owner

I don't understand this. Sounds like a slogan, but we already have a slogan above.

Also, why is this relevant to the download section?

Maybe shorter: Free Software forever!

I don't understand this. Sounds like a slogan, but we already have a slogan above. Also, why is this relevant to the download section? Maybe shorter: Free Software forever!
Poster
Owner

I removed it, redundant indeed.

I removed it, redundant indeed.
dachary marked this conversation as resolved
tenetur, qui veritatis cumque quaerat doloremque? Adipisci quidem sunt quia esse nam quo.
Gitea exclusively Free Software forever.
Download binaries from https://codeberg.org/codename/codename/releases.
Get docker images from codeberg.org/codename/codename:1.18.0 and codeberg.org/codename/codename:1.18.0-rootless.
fnetX commented 4 months ago
Owner

I don't yet know how this looks, but maybe we should make these points more actionable?

(convert into a clickable link for the first, and use a copy-able code section for the latter)

Get Docker images using either
```
docker pull ...
```
or if you prefer (explain difference)
```
docker pull ...
```
I don't yet know how this looks, but maybe we should make these points more actionable? (convert into a clickable link for the first, and use a copy-able code section for the latter) ~~~ Get Docker images using either ``` docker pull ... ``` or if you prefer (explain difference) ``` docker pull ... ``` ~~~
Poster
Owner

Changed to "Get Forgejo" with CLI that can be copy pasted so someone willing to get forgejo does not need to look further.

Changed to "Get Forgejo" with CLI that can be copy pasted so someone willing to get forgejo does not need to look further.
dachary marked this conversation as resolved
</p>
<h2 class="text-2xl pb-10">Get involved</h2>
<p>
Help with additional features (federation, etc.), releases management, User Research, UX, community management, documentation, web design, governance and more.
fnetX commented 4 months ago
Owner

Call for action first!

Codename consists of motivated people, and we are looking forward to your contribution. Feel free to help in the domains of ...

(eventually with links, eventually as a list)

Call for action first! Codename consists of motivated people, and we are looking forward to your contribution. Feel free to help in the domains of ... (eventually with links, eventually as a list)
Poster
Owner

Added the suggested wording.

Added the suggested wording.
dachary marked this conversation as resolved
Help with additional features (federation, etc.), releases management, User Research, UX, community management, documentation, web design, governance and more.
Code https://codeberg.org/codename/codename
Website https://codeberg.org/codename/website
Community and Governance https://codeberg.org/codename/meta
fnetX commented 4 months ago
Owner

are the line breaks displayed? Might look very ugly if this is one line ...

are the line breaks displayed? Might look very ugly if this is one line ...
Poster
Owner

I'm looking at the content but the display will need work indeed.

I'm looking at the content but the display will need work indeed.
dachary marked this conversation as resolved
Website https://codeberg.org/codename/website
Community and Governance https://codeberg.org/codename/meta
Codename is run by a self governed community under the umbrella of the Codeberg e.V. democratic non-profit dedicated to Free Software.
fnetX commented 4 months ago
Owner

too many words without time for breathing ... maybe better:

Codename is run by a self governed community(,?) under the umbrella of the Codeberg e.V., a democratic non-profit dedicated to Free Software.

too many words without time for breathing ... maybe better: Codename is run by a self governed community(,?) under the umbrella of the Codeberg e.V., a democratic non-profit dedicated to Free Software.
Poster
Owner

I moved this to the top in a "What is Forgejo" section. And reworded completely.

I moved this to the top in a "What is Forgejo" section. And reworded completely.
dachary marked this conversation as resolved
Poster
Owner

@fnetX thanks for the review 💙 Before I go rework this with your input, do you think having this content (download Codename + get involved) on the home page is the best use of this space?

I kind of assumed that for the launch explaining what Codename is about does not matter much because the audience is composed of people who already know Gitea. Maybe I'm assuming too much?

@fnetX thanks for the review 💙 Before I go rework this with your input, do you think having this content (download Codename + get involved) on the home page is the best use of this space? I kind of assumed that for the launch explaining what Codename is about does not matter much because the audience is composed of people who already know Gitea. Maybe I'm assuming too much?
Owner

@dachary I pushed to your branch, to prevent Woodpecker from publishing a Pull Request.

@dachary I pushed to your branch, to prevent Woodpecker from publishing a Pull Request.
dachary force-pushed wip-homepage from 0d99d59809 to 54f5d4c25c 4 months ago
Ryuno-Ki reviewed 4 months ago
Ryuno-Ki left a comment

Some remarks. Can be done in follow-up PRs if you prefer.

Some remarks. Can be done in follow-up PRs if you prefer.
</section>
<section class="centered-content py-10">
<h2 class="text-2xl pb-10">Is this a fork? A new movement?</h2>
<h2 class="text-2xl pb-10">Download Codename</h2>

It's no longer Codename.

It's no longer Codename.
dachary marked this conversation as resolved
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit. Earum et veniam fugit sunt, vel enim laborum ratione
tenetur, qui veritatis cumque quaerat doloremque? Adipisci quidem sunt quia esse nam quo.
Gitea exclusively Free Software forever.
Download binaries from https://codeberg.org/codename/codename/releases.

Link needs update.

Do you intentionally don't wrap it in <a>?

Link needs update. Do you intentionally don't wrap it in `<a>`?
Poster
Owner

Yeah, I was not really focused on how it looked :)

Yeah, I was not really focused on how it looked :)
dachary marked this conversation as resolved
</p>
<h2 class="text-2xl pb-10">Get involved</h2>
<p>
Help with additional features (federation, etc.), releases management, User Research, UX, community management, documentation, web design, governance and more.

The wording is a bit off here.

You make it sound like those are „nice to have”s.
Perhaps something like:

Want to help but don't know code? We need you. Get in touch if you can help us with release management, user research, UX, [and so forth]

The wording is a bit off here. You make it sound like those are „nice to have”s. Perhaps something like: > Want to help but don't know code? We need you. Get in touch if you can help us with release management, user research, UX, [and so forth]
Poster
Owner

Right, reworded entirely with @fnetX suggestions.

Right, reworded entirely with @fnetX suggestions.
dachary marked this conversation as resolved
Owner

do you think having this content (download Codename + get involved) on the home page is the best use of this space?

I kind of assumed that for the launch explaining what Codename is about does not matter much because the audience is composed of people who already know Gitea. Maybe I'm assuming too much?

I think I'd have an opening paragraph saying what Forgejo is, and then continue with "Download", "Get Involved", etc below.

Or maybe "Get Started" rather than "Download", because hopefully people will eventually be able to install from package managers or docker etc rather than downloading a build manually...

That opening paragraph needs wrting anyway for Forgejo/forgejo#7 🙂

> do you think having this content (download Codename + get involved) on the home page is the best use of this space? > > I kind of assumed that for the launch explaining what Codename is about does not matter much because the audience is composed of people who already know Gitea. Maybe I'm assuming too much? I think I'd have an opening paragraph saying what Forgejo is, and then continue with "Download", "Get Involved", etc below. Or maybe "Get Started" rather than "Download", because hopefully people will eventually be able to install from package managers or docker etc rather than downloading a build manually... That opening paragraph needs wrting anyway for Forgejo/forgejo#7 🙂

The homepage still says „Codename”. Would be great if we could get this PR merged somewhat soonish.

The homepage still says „Codename”. Would be great if we could get this PR merged somewhat soonish.
Poster
Owner

do you think having this content (download Codename + get involved) on the home page is the best use of this space?

I kind of assumed that for the launch explaining what Codename is about does not matter much because the audience is composed of people who already know Gitea. Maybe I'm assuming too much?

I think I'd have an opening paragraph saying what Forgejo is, and then continue with "Download", "Get Involved", etc below.

Done.

Or maybe "Get Started" rather than "Download", because hopefully people will eventually be able to install from package managers or docker etc rather than downloading a build manually...

Done.

That opening paragraph needs wrting anyway for Forgejo/forgejo#7 🙂

:-)

> > do you think having this content (download Codename + get involved) on the home page is the best use of this space? > > > > I kind of assumed that for the launch explaining what Codename is about does not matter much because the audience is composed of people who already know Gitea. Maybe I'm assuming too much? > > I think I'd have an opening paragraph saying what Forgejo is, and then continue with "Download", "Get Involved", etc below. Done. > > Or maybe "Get Started" rather than "Download", because hopefully people will eventually be able to install from package managers or docker etc rather than downloading a build manually... > Done. > That opening paragraph needs wrting anyway for Forgejo/forgejo#7 🙂 :-)
dachary added 1 commit 4 months ago
afe56c5f45
Content of the home page
dachary force-pushed wip-homepage from 934c2da39d to f6313928ab 4 months ago
dachary force-pushed wip-homepage from f6313928ab to be87ef5642 4 months ago
dachary force-pushed wip-homepage from be87ef5642 to 2f1cb3b038 4 months ago
dachary force-pushed wip-homepage from 2f1cb3b038 to 83467a09f0 4 months ago
dachary force-pushed wip-homepage from 83467a09f0 to 81267554d6 4 months ago
dachary force-pushed wip-homepage from 81267554d6 to 514286cf6f 4 months ago
dachary force-pushed wip-homepage from 514286cf6f to 992082121e 4 months ago

Please leave a comment once this is ready for re-review.

Please leave a comment once this is ready for re-review.
Poster
Owner

You can browse the changes at https://forgejo.codeberg.page/@wip-homepage/

You can browse the changes at https://forgejo.codeberg.page/@wip-homepage/
dachary force-pushed wip-homepage from 4d762ba069 to 95bef4d24c 4 months ago
Ryuno-Ki reviewed 4 months ago
<h2 class="text-2xl pb-10">Get Forgejo</h2>
<p>
Binary for amd64 or <a href="https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/releases">other architectures</a>.
<ul>

I would expect this to be a <pre><code> instead of <ul><li>.

I would expect this to be a `<pre><code>` instead of `<ul><li>`.
Poster
Owner

I'm focused on content rather than presentation right now since the web design is not final just yet.

I'm focused on content rather than presentation right now since the web design is not final just yet.
dachary marked this conversation as resolved
dachary force-pushed wip-homepage from 95bef4d24c to 8d84cd6d45 4 months ago
Poster
Owner

image

![image](/attachments/f664a4ee-ce55-4a8e-8d34-e2ff79ea86fd)
159 KiB
Poster
Owner

Regarding the tagline, the place holder will be replaced once forgejo/meta#42 is resolved. I don't think it should block this PR though.

Regarding the tagline, the place holder will be replaced once https://codeberg.org/forgejo/meta/issues/42 is resolved. I don't think it should block this PR though.
dachary force-pushed wip-homepage from 8d84cd6d45 to fa4411daa2 4 months ago
Ryuno-Ki reviewed 4 months ago
<p>
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit. Earum et veniam fugit sunt, vel enim laborum ratione
tenetur, qui veritatis cumque quaerat doloremque? Adipisci quidem sunt quia esse nam quo.
Forgejo is a self-hosted lightweight software forge, easy to install and low maintenance that just does the job. Brought to you by an inclusive community under the umbrella of <a href="https://docs.codeberg.org/getting-started/what-is-codeberg/#what-is-codeberg-e.v.%3F">Codeberg e.V.</a> a democratic non-profit organization, Forgejo can be trusted to be exclusively Free Software. It is a "soft" fork of Gitea with a focus on scaling, federation and privacy.

Can you wrap scaling, federation and privacy in <strong>?
Those are the catchwords we want to emphasize.

Can you wrap `scaling`, `federation` and `privacy` in `<strong>`? Those are the catchwords we want to emphasize.
Poster
Owner

The look & feel is going to change, do you mind if that's posponed until after?

The look & feel is going to change, do you mind if that's posponed until after?

I don't.

The comment here isn't vanishing or anything.

I don't. The comment here isn't vanishing or anything.
dachary marked this conversation as resolved

In my point of view, I would merge it (as it is a progress over the current state), but extract the comments into another issue to be picked up once the forgejo/meta#42 etc are resolved.

In my point of view, I would merge it (as it is a progress over the current state), but extract the comments into another issue to be picked up once the https://codeberg.org/forgejo/meta/issues/42 etc are resolved.
dachary force-pushed wip-homepage from fa4411daa2 to 46b1c679a7 4 months ago
dachary force-pushed wip-homepage from e70c5fd424 to 9d53429c8c 4 months ago
dachary force-pushed wip-homepage from 9d53429c8c to 2626d6ecec 4 months ago
dachary force-pushed wip-homepage from 57fbff558d to 392d45a99b 4 months ago
dachary force-pushed wip-homepage from 392d45a99b to 766caec8d7 4 months ago
dachary force-pushed wip-homepage from 766caec8d7 to 6cbac09fda 4 months ago
dachary force-pushed wip-homepage from 6cbac09fda to 14e4ce3bf0 4 months ago
Poster
Owner

I'll merge as suggested since there has not been much activity in the past few days.

I'll merge as suggested since there has not been much activity in the past few days.
dachary merged commit 14e4ce3bf0 into main 4 months ago
dachary deleted branch wip-homepage 4 months ago

Reviewers

fnetX was requested for review 4 months ago
circlebuilder was requested for review 4 months ago
caesar was requested for review 4 months ago
oliverpool was requested for review 4 months ago
Ryuno-Ki was requested for review 4 months ago
ci/woodpecker/push/woodpecker Pipeline was successful
The pull request has been merged as 14e4ce3bf0.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No Assignees
5 Participants
Notifications
Due Date

No due date set.

Reference: forgejo/website#15
Loading…
There is no content yet.