forgejo/forgejo

Planning to implement ActivityPub user follow updates #4277

New issue

Open

opened 2024-06-30 20:13:06 +00:00 by algernon · 6 comments

algernon commented

2024-06-30 20:13:06 +00:00

Member

I'm planning to implement the following things Very Soon, aiming to get it into a mergeable state in 2-2.5 weeks:

Send out activities to followers
Render followed user updates in user feeds
Periodically fetch and update cached remote users' data
Periodically clean out the avatar cache

The work is funded by the federation grant, and will be using go-ap, building on what is in modules/forgefed.

The goals are a work in progress, and should be discussed further in this issue.

I'm planning to implement the following things Very Soon, aiming to get it into a mergeable state in 2-2.5 weeks: - Send out activities to followers - Render followed user updates in user feeds - Periodically fetch and update cached remote users' data - Periodically clean out the avatar cache The work is funded by the federation grant, and will be using go-ap, building on what is in `modules/forgefed`. The goals are a work in progress, and should be discussed further in this issue.

algernon added the

enhancement/feature

forgejo/federation

labels 2024-06-30 20:13:08 +00:00

algernon self-assigned this 2024-06-30 20:13:30 +00:00

earl-warren commented

2024-06-30 21:09:51 +00:00

Owner

I'm willing to help and can make it a priority. I have reviewed @jerger work but you know the codebase better than I do so you won't need me there. However, I can work with @twenty-panda on the testing side of things. You will rely on mocks I suppose and not run multiple instances of Forgejo.

There has been progress in the end-to-end suite but the testsuite is not used yet. I'm not even sure how and if it can be used in the current state of Forgejo. But I will figure that out now and see if it can complement your work.

If you have other ideas on how I can make myself useful, please let me know. I'll follow your lead.

I'm willing to help and can make it a priority. I have reviewed @jerger work but you know the codebase better than I do so you won't need me there. However, I can work with @twenty-panda on the testing side of things. You will rely on mocks I suppose and not run multiple instances of Forgejo. There has been progress in the end-to-end suite but the [testsuite is not used yet](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/discussions/issues/183). I'm not even sure how and if it can be used in the current state of Forgejo. But I will figure that out now and see if it can complement your work. If you have other ideas on how I can make myself useful, please let me know. I'll follow your lead.

earl-warren referenced this issue

2024-07-02 07:49:10 +00:00

[BUG] The Mastodon OAuth strategy does not allow users to register, it is only possible to use it on pre-existing accounts. #209

jerger commented

2024-07-04 14:58:03 +00:00

Member

Is there anything to look at / review ?

Is there anything to look at / review ?

earl-warren commented

2024-07-04 15:33:57 +00:00

Owner

Not yet, @algernon is knee deep in the implementation of quotas and I'm knee deep in the preparation of the v8.0 release.

Not yet, @algernon is knee deep in the implementation of quotas and I'm knee deep in the preparation of the v8.0 release.

earl-warren referenced this issue from forgejo/discussions

2024-07-07 10:30:24 +00:00

ActivityPub in GitLab #184

earl-warren commented

2024-07-17 04:31:40 +00:00

Owner

@algernon now that v8.0 is ready to go, I have time to help 😇

@algernon now that v8.0 is ready to go, I have time to help 😇

algernon commented

2024-07-17 10:26:02 +00:00

Author

Member

I'm currently digging into go-ap & forgefed stuff, hoping to have something up by the weekend. Questions, if nothing else (but I hope to have questions and some bits of code).

I'm currently digging into go-ap & forgefed stuff, hoping to have something up by the weekend. Questions, if nothing else (but I hope to have questions and some bits of code).

algernon referenced this issue

2024-07-31 17:52:14 +00:00

WIP: Federated user activity following #4767

algernon commented

2024-07-31 21:40:48 +00:00

Author

Member

There's now a WIP PR up at #4767.

There's now a WIP PR up at #4767.

Sign in to join this conversation.

No labels

backport/v1.21/forgejo

backport/v7.0/forgejo

backport/v8.0/forgejo

needs-more-info

reported-upstream

dependency-upgrade

asciinema-player

editorconfig-checker

git-backporting

go-sql-driver mysql

postcss-plugins

prometheus client_golang

relative-time-element

temporal-polyfill

terminal-to-html

text-expander-element

enhancement/feature

forgejo/accessibility

forgejo/actions

forgejo/branding

forgejo/documentation

forgejo/federation

forgejo/furnace cleanup

forgejo/internationalization

forgejo/moderation

forgejo/privacy

forgejo/release

forgejo/scaling

forgejo/security

good first issue

do-not-exist-yet

Manually tested during feature freeze

release blocker

release-blocker

release-blocker

release-blocker

release-blocker

release-blocker

release-blocker

run-end-to-end-tests

worth a release-note

User Research - Accessibility

User Research - bug

User Research - Config (instance)

User Research - Dashboard

User Research - documentation

User Research - Errors

User Research - feature

User Research - federation

User Research - Filters

User Research - governance

User Research - Labels

User Research - Moderation

User Research - Needs Input

User Research - Notifications

User Research - release

User Research - Repo creation

User Research - Repo Units

User Research - security

User Research - Settings (in-app)

User Research - testing

User Research - UI

User Research - UX

No milestone

No project

No assignees

3 participants

Notifications

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: forgejo/forgejo#4277

No description provided.