Create black/white logo and add it to forkawesome #13
Closed
opened 3 years ago by mray
·
13 comments
No Milestone
No Assignees
4 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Blocks
#411 Should Codeberg have an icon in Fork Awesome/Font Awesome?
Codeberg/Community
Reference: Codeberg/Design#13
Loading…
Reference in new issue
There is no content yet.
Delete Branch '%!s(<nil>)'
Deleting a branch is permanent. It CANNOT be undone. Continue?
I'm certain the codeberg logo will get included here if provide a good file. https://forkaweso.me/Fork-Awesome/
I there has to be a proper version that does not rely on gradients and different colors.
I'm working on that…
My result:
I attach a cleaned up svg version.
Should this also be used as favicon?
No, this version is specifically for the technical restriction of not having colors/gradients of any kind – it can be applied just like a chatracter in a font (fork awesome actually being a font).
Favicons can easily make use of colors and gradients.
@mray I think we should add this to the logo kit as well. I can add it with your permission :)
I'm hesitant because I'm aware how quickly people will just grab the zip, browse through it and just go with what they think looks cool. No matter how hard we try to make clear that this is a very special purpose version of the Codeberg symbol.
What do you think?
I think we should still publish it in this centralized repo. If someone really wanted to use this logo they would just grab it from here or Fork Awesome once we publish it there anyway.
Forkawesome still does not ship it. Maybe we need to get in touch again or clarify whatever the issue is!?
Looks like it was merged, but due to bad timing it isn' released yet. Should finally be available with the next release. Closing again.
Proposed addition of Fork Awesome to Iconify: https://github.com/iconify/icon-sets/issues/38
Iconify found some issues with Fork Awesome. Not sure what other routes there are to get another Codeberg icon into Iconify that meets design specs. Here's the one collection the icon exist in currently: https://icones.js.org/collection/simple-icons?s=codeberg. Perhaps they'd be willing to accept an update to the icon but I haven't checked.
They should not have an incentive to keep using a wrong logo when we offer to provide the original. Maybe just ask to update Codeberg.org in their set with the original I posted? I can understand why they would not want to bulk import a ton of new icons.
It is up to every icon project to maintain their own standards. But it is also up to us to help rectifing bad adaptions when possible.
Looks like cyberalien on github is not aware that forkawesome provides a font. The source SVG files are all cropped badly in the browser, but work just fine in the font.
The "bad quality" of "the iconset" he sees is a plain mistake. Maybe somebody can kindly point that out to him :) - he is missing out on a great resource there I think...
has been merged, but not released yet. Closing.