[Feature/Discussion]: Sort the entries in the Widget picker #9760

Open
opened 3 months ago by Unattributed · 3 comments

What feature would you like implemented?

Sort the entries in the Widget picker drop-down menu.

Why should we add this feature?

Currently the widget list is an unsorted mess... It's tricky to find the items that you want from it. It would be a good step to sort the list.

Version

13.2.0-beta3

Instance

calckey.social

What browser are you using?

Firefox

Relevant log output

No response

Contribution Guidelines

  • I agree to follow this project's Contribution Guidelines
### What feature would you like implemented? Sort the entries in the Widget picker drop-down menu. ### Why should we add this feature? Currently the widget list is an unsorted mess... It's tricky to find the items that you want from it. It would be a good step to sort the list. ### Version 13.2.0-beta3 ### Instance calckey.social ### What browser are you using? Firefox ### Relevant log output _No response_ ### Contribution Guidelines - [x] I agree to follow this project's Contribution Guidelines
Unattributed changed title from [Feature]: Sort the entries in the Widget picker to [Feature/Discussion]: Sort the entries in the Widget picker 3 months ago
Poster

I marked this as a feature / discussion item as it really doesn't rise to the level of being a bug, but it is something that I think should be addressed. (It's also kind of low hanging fruit that makes it probably not too difficult....)

I marked this as a feature / discussion item as it really doesn't rise to the level of being a bug, but it is something that I think should be addressed. (It's also kind of low hanging fruit that makes it probably not too difficult....)
panos added the
Feature
label 2 months ago
panos commented 2 months ago
Owner

TBH I don't think this needs to be discussed, it would obviously be better if widgets were alphabetically sorted. I don't think that they are too many, so that another approach (grouping them) might be needed, simple alphabetical order should be good enough.

TBH I don't think this needs to be discussed, it would obviously be better if widgets were alphabetically sorted. I don't think that they are too many, so that another approach (grouping them) might be needed, simple alphabetical order should be good enough.

A request to anyone who implements this: Please determine the order according to the locale of each language, rather than simply sorting alphabetically (if possible).

A request to anyone who implements this: Please determine the order according to the locale of each language, rather than simply sorting alphabetically (if possible).
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: calckey/calckey#9760
Loading…
There is no content yet.