@@ -0,0 +53,4 @@
+
+There are also a few positive reactions on social media.
+
+We all have questions in our head and ask the Gitea team to clear them up.

@@ -0,0 +58,4 @@
+
+If the announced changes to Gitea really help bring the project forward,
+we wish them all the best,
+however asking them to stay independent and open, avoid relations to cryptocurrency

@@ -0,0 +7,4 @@
+since the (to us somewhat surprising) [blog post of Gitea](https://blog.gitea.io/2022/10/open-source-sustainment-and-the-future-of-gitea/)
+which essentially seems to announce heavy coupling of Gitea and a new-founded for-profit company.
+Although this move was done by the maintainers,
+it seems not to have [everyone aborad](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33341587).

@@ -0,0 +4,4 @@
+Authors: Otto (Codeberg e. V.)
+
+Hello everyone,
+since the (to us somewhat surprising) [blog post of Gitea](https://blog.gitea.io/2022/10/open-source-sustainment-and-the-future-of-gitea/)

@@ -0,0 +5,4 @@
+
+Hello everyone,
+since the (to us somewhat surprising) [blog post of Gitea](https://blog.gitea.io/2022/10/open-source-sustainment-and-the-future-of-gitea/)
+which essentially seems to announce heavy coupling of Gitea and a new-founded for-profit company.

@@ -0,0 +7,4 @@
+since the (to us somewhat surprising) [blog post of Gitea](https://blog.gitea.io/2022/10/open-source-sustainment-and-the-future-of-gitea/)
+which essentially seems to announce heavy coupling of Gitea and a new-founded for-profit company.
+Although this move was done by the maintainers,
+it seems not to have [everyone aborad](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33341587).

@@ -0,0 +7,4 @@
+
+We read the [blog post of Gitea](https://blog.gitea.io/2022/10/open-source-sustainment-and-the-future-of-gitea/),
+which essentially seems to announce heavy coupling of Gitea and a newly-founded company.
+Although this move was done by the elected owners of the project,

@@ -0,0 +48,4 @@
+These concerns include:
+
+- relationship between DAO and cryptocurrencies, blockchain etc (Codeberg has, definitely, a critic stance towards these technologies, but let's wait for clarification)
+- possible impact of the codebase, especially if certan features become "enterprise only"

@@ -0,0 +52,4 @@
+- the effect on the Gitea developers, contributors and community, as well as
+- influence on Codeberg and its public perception
+
+There are also a few positive reactions on social media.

@@ -0,0 +6,4 @@
+Hello everyone,
+
+We read the [blog post of Gitea](https://blog.gitea.io/2022/10/open-source-sustainment-and-the-future-of-gitea/),
+which essentially seems to announce heavy coupling of Gitea and a newly-founded company.

@@ -0,0 +28,4 @@
+Let me point out that we have had an awesome collaboration with most Gitea contributors in the past and the project in general.
+We do not want to make hard cuts too fast, but rather look how the situation evolves,
+and react accordingly.
+We wish them all the best and hope they can find a sustainable way in agreement with their community of compensating their effort.

@@ -0,0 +82,4 @@
+Also, there are some new Codeberg patches cooking,
+and although only cosmetic, they should that we add our own unique touch to whatever upstream Gitea provides ;)
+
+Last but not least, I want to thank the Gitea project and all its contributors for the great work they have done in the past, and will hopefully continue to do.

@@ -0,0 +83,4 @@
+and although only cosmetic, they should that we add our own unique touch to whatever upstream Gitea provides ;)
+
+Last but not least, I want to thank the Gitea project and all its contributors for the great work they have done in the past, and will hopefully continue to do.
+We hope that Gitea stays independent and open, avoids relations to cryptocurrency

@@ -0,0 +7,4 @@
+
+We read the [blog post of Gitea](https://blog.gitea.io/2022/10/open-source-sustainment-and-the-future-of-gitea/),
+which essentially seems to announce heavy coupling of Gitea and a newly-founded company.
+Although this move was done some people deeply involved in project,

@@ -0,0 +19,4 @@
+
+Please be assured that our decisions will be made independent and together with our users and community.
+Codeberg and Gitea are separate projects,
+in terms of governance, userbase and even some technical bits.

@@ -0,0 +46,4 @@
+These concerns include:
+
+- possible relationship between DAO and cryptocurrencies, blockchain etc (Codeberg has, definitely, a critic stance towards these technologies)
+- possible impact of the codebase, especially if certain features become "enterprise only"