Add link to code search repo and improve the desc #35
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
No Milestone
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: Codeberg/Contributing#35
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
There is no content yet.
Delete Branch "yoctozepto/codeberg-Contributing:code-search-repo"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may exist for a short time before cleaning up, in most cases it CANNOT be undone. Continue?
@ -106,3 +106,3 @@
| [Weblate](https://translate.codeberg.org) | Co-maintainers welcome | Matrix: [#codeberg-translate:bubu1.eu](https://matrix.to/#/#codeberg-translate:bubu1.eu?via=matrix.org?via=mozilla.org?via=tchncs.de) | Some call to build trust | |
| [Continuous Integration](https://ci.codeberg.org) | Co-maintainers very welcome | Matrix: [#codeberg-ci:obermui.de](https://matrix.to/#/#codeberg-ci:obermui.de?via=matrix.org?via=mozilla.org?via=tchncs.de) | Some call to build trust, maybe some LXC/Docker experience | |
| Code Search | [@fourstepper](https://codeberg.org/fourstepper), [@yoctozepto](https://codeberg.org/yoctozepto) are experimenting with potential solutions, help still needed | Matrix: [#codeberg-code-search:matrix.org](https://matrix.to/#/#codeberg-code-search:matrix.org) | Experience with related tech stacks (see [Codeberg/Community#904](https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/904)), trust-building | If you have any experience with Forgejo/Gitea-specific setups and would like to participate in the team, please do get in touch! |
| Code Search | [@fourstepper](https://codeberg.org/fourstepper), [@yoctozepto](https://codeberg.org/yoctozepto) are experimenting with potential solutions, help still needed | [Repository](https://codeberg.org/Codeberg-Infrastructure/build-deploy-forgejo/) and Matrix: [#codeberg-code-search:matrix.org](https://matrix.to/#/#codeberg-code-search:matrix.org) | Experience with related tech stacks (see [Codeberg/Community#904](https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/904)), trust-building | If you have any experience with code search and would like to participate in the team, please do get in touch! |
help still
neededappreciatedTBH, I also noticed that but decided to leave it be. I mean, long-term we need extra hands. One-shot we are probably in good standing. How strong do you feel about your suggestion? (/me open to fix quickly)
I mean, I feel strongly that we really don’t need another person right away but always welcome any additions to the team.
IMO this leaves more space for additional contributors to join other teams that may be understaffed at the moment instead of joining the code search team that already has two members
3c4e4911f8
to1e89f86219