Codeberg-Infrastructure
/
build-deploy-gitea
14
16
Fork 20
Code Issues 9 Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity
Labels Milestones

Allow custom repo name for *.org pages & add design.codeberg.org #51

Merged
hw merged 1 commits from momar/build-deploy-gitea:feature/design-resources into master 11 months ago
Conversation 10 Commits 1 Files Changed 1
momar commented 11 months ago
Owner
There is no content yet.
momar added 1 commit 11 months ago
hw commented 11 months ago
Owner

How does this work?

How does this work?
momar commented 11 months ago
Poster
Owner

It's not as awesome as it sounds, it just allows the mapping of fonts.codeberg.org not just to codeberg-fonts/pages but to Codeberg/Fonts, so we can restructure the Codeberg-internal pages repositories (like pages, get-it-on etc.) a bit, and uses that to expose the Codeberg/Design repo at design.codeberg.org.

It's not as awesome as it sounds, it just allows the mapping of `fonts.codeberg.org` not just to `codeberg-fonts/pages` but to `Codeberg/Fonts`, so we can restructure the Codeberg-internal pages repositories (like pages, get-it-on etc.) a bit, and uses that to expose the `Codeberg/Design` repo at design.codeberg.org.
hw commented 11 months ago
Owner

cool, will move this around asap

cool, will move this around asap
momar commented 11 months ago
Poster
Owner

Any update on this? 🙃

Any update on this? 🙃
hw merged commit 8c1c45ef81 into master 11 months ago
hw commented 11 months ago
Owner

merged to master, deployed to https://codeberg-test.org

merged to master, deployed to https://codeberg-test.org
momar commented 11 months ago
Poster
Owner

Thanks! I'm not a member of the Codeberg org on test, could you migrate the Design repo to the test server?

Thanks! I'm not a member of the Codeberg org on test, could you migrate the Design repo to the test server?
fnetX commented 11 months ago
Collaborator

... or be more generous with the rights on the testing instance, might come in handy from time to time 😉

... or be more generous with the rights on the testing instance, might come in handy from time to time 😉
hw commented 11 months ago
Owner

Thanks! I'm not a member of the Codeberg org on test, could you migrate the Design repo to the test server?

;) now you are

> Thanks! I'm not a member of the Codeberg org on test, could you migrate the Design repo to the test server? ;) now you are
momar commented 11 months ago
Poster
Owner

Oh, thank you! 🙃

It is deployed, however I found out that the repo names actually have to be lowercase in $subdomain_repo, and that the page still has the wrong content type (and thus doesn't display) due to #50 / #52.

Do you want to correct the upper-/lowercase typo directly on master or shall I fix it on my branch & create a new PR?

Oh, thank you! 🙃 It is deployed, however I found out that the repo names actually have to be lowercase in `$subdomain_repo`, and that the page still has the wrong content type (and thus doesn't display) due to #50 / #52. Do you want to correct the upper-/lowercase typo directly on master or shall I fix it on my branch & create a new PR?
momar commented 11 months ago
Poster
Owner

I have added another commit that fixes said typo, so you can cherry-pick it

I have added another commit that fixes said typo, so you can cherry-pick it
The pull request has been merged as 8c1c45ef81.
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
Request review
No reviewers
Labels
Apply labels
Clear labels
inadvertently closed
Closed because of updated branch names - might still be valid! Kind: Breaking Kind: Bug Kind: Enhancement Kind: Feature Kind: Maintenance Kind: Question Kind: Security Kind: Testing Priority: Critical
The priority is critical Priority: High
The priority is high Priority: Low
The priority is low Priority: Medium
The priority is medium Status: Blocked Status: Completed
Work is complete Status: Help wanted Status: In progress
Work is in progress Status: Needs feedback
Feedback is needed Status: Stale
No Label inadvertently closed Kind: Breaking Kind: Bug Kind: Enhancement Kind: Feature Kind: Maintenance Kind: Question Kind: Security Kind: Testing Priority: Critical Priority: High Priority: Low Priority: Medium Status: Blocked Status: Completed Status: Help wanted Status: In progress Status: Needs feedback Status: Stale
Milestone
Set milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
Assignees
Assign users
Clear assignees
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

This pull request currently doesn't have any dependencies.

Write Preview
Loading…
Cancel
Save
There is no content yet.
Delete Branch 'momar/build-deploy-gitea:feature/design-resources'

Deleting a branch is permanent. It CANNOT be undone. Continue?

No
Yes